"Celui qui dit qu'un homme a le droit de s'opposer à la Loi, dit que la volonté d'un seul est au-dessus de la volonté de tous. Il dit que la nation n'est rien, et qu'un seul homme est tout. S'il ajoute que ce droit appartient à celui qui et revêtu du pouvoir exécutif, il dit que l'homme établi par la Nation, pour faire exécuter les volontés de la nation, a le droit de contrarier et d'enchaîner les volontés de la nation ; il a créé un monstre inconcevable en morale et en politique, et ce monstre n'est autre chose que le véto royal", Maximilien de Robespierre.
Freedom is an illusion, at least in Miami, take you pink glasses off and look straight into reality. Raanan Katz, Miami Heat and RK Centers owner, have been going to courts for PROFITS (NOT DAMAGES) for many years and many members of the public were affected by Raanan Katz multiple rent collection scheme that works in amazingly simple way: Raanan Katz claims in Miami court future rent from the former tenant (as a damages) while receiving rent from a new tenant.
Court papers and sworn affidavits filed with the court by Raanan Katz multiple companies speak for themselves.
Now, Raanan Katz attorney Todd Levine argues that acceleration lease clause (that helps to claim future rent from former tenants) is legal, but who argues that it's not. The question is the abuse of this acceleration clause through violation of economic loss rule. Raanan Katz attorney, Todd Levine, pretends ignoring the fact that his client is required by the applicable law to mitigate damages by attempting to release the premises to a replacement tenant.
However, we see enough examples when Raanan Katz already leased the premises to a new tenant and still claimed from former tenant 1 to 5 year lease in advance through the court as his "damages".
Interestingly, Raanan Katz implemented and highly uses this "multiple rent scheme collection" in Miami court.
Shockingly, judge Lisa Walsh has all documents that demonstrate Raanan Katz "multiple rent scheme collection" activities, yet no action was taken to protect members of the public that being attacked by Miami based billionaire.
Looks like Judge Walsh is more inclined to Raanan Katz unsupported defamation per se claims, rather than Raanan Katz refusal to produce ANY documents supporting his "defamation" damages claim.
Why? When the documents get produced we will be able to see the amount of Raanan Katz profit from "multiple rent scheme collection". We will be able to see the facts that Raanan Katz is trying to hide through his abusive litigation tactic.
But, it will be a normal lawful procedure in the non biased court. I do not believe we have one here in Miami. No matter what billionaire Katz, does it will be covered, I have no doubts. Judges that rule not based on the matter of law and public, but simply in Raanan Katz , le véto royal, favor and protection, are not interested in Raanan Katz proof.
Court of appeal already recognized an abuse of the trial court discretion in Raanan Katz "defamation" case, providing clear law violations by Miami Dade state court.
More important, court of appeal highlighted that "damages" and "falsity" are essential elements in Raanan Katz case. This could have been easily discovered. But, trial judge Lisa Walsh denies to hear compel matters, leaving at least five motions to compel Raanan Katz discovery open for more than two years. This is what I call abuse of discretion.
Interestingly, Raanan Katz attorney stated just yesterday "The will be a day when jury will look and see how false and mean-spirited her statements are..." This sounds like a bluff, Raanan Katz has nothing to produce and to show to jury in support of his one of many frivolous claims.
Take your pink glasses off, do not live under some type of freedom illusion.
Freedom is an illusion, at least in Miami, take you pink glasses off and look straight into reality. Raanan Katz, Miami Heat and RK Centers owner, have been going to courts for PROFITS (NOT DAMAGES) for many years and many members of the public were affected by Raanan Katz multiple rent collection scheme that works in amazingly simple way: Raanan Katz claims in Miami court future rent from the former tenant (as a damages) while receiving rent from a new tenant.
Court papers and sworn affidavits filed with the court by Raanan Katz multiple companies speak for themselves.
Now, Raanan Katz attorney Todd Levine argues that acceleration lease clause (that helps to claim future rent from former tenants) is legal, but who argues that it's not. The question is the abuse of this acceleration clause through violation of economic loss rule. Raanan Katz attorney, Todd Levine, pretends ignoring the fact that his client is required by the applicable law to mitigate damages by attempting to release the premises to a replacement tenant.
However, we see enough examples when Raanan Katz already leased the premises to a new tenant and still claimed from former tenant 1 to 5 year lease in advance through the court as his "damages".
Interestingly, Raanan Katz implemented and highly uses this "multiple rent scheme collection" in Miami court.
Shockingly, judge Lisa Walsh has all documents that demonstrate Raanan Katz "multiple rent scheme collection" activities, yet no action was taken to protect members of the public that being attacked by Miami based billionaire.
Looks like Judge Walsh is more inclined to Raanan Katz unsupported defamation per se claims, rather than Raanan Katz refusal to produce ANY documents supporting his "defamation" damages claim.
Why? When the documents get produced we will be able to see the amount of Raanan Katz profit from "multiple rent scheme collection". We will be able to see the facts that Raanan Katz is trying to hide through his abusive litigation tactic.
But, it will be a normal lawful procedure in the non biased court. I do not believe we have one here in Miami. No matter what billionaire Katz, does it will be covered, I have no doubts. Judges that rule not based on the matter of law and public, but simply in Raanan Katz , le véto royal, favor and protection, are not interested in Raanan Katz proof.
Court of appeal already recognized an abuse of the trial court discretion in Raanan Katz "defamation" case, providing clear law violations by Miami Dade state court.
More important, court of appeal highlighted that "damages" and "falsity" are essential elements in Raanan Katz case. This could have been easily discovered. But, trial judge Lisa Walsh denies to hear compel matters, leaving at least five motions to compel Raanan Katz discovery open for more than two years. This is what I call abuse of discretion.
Interestingly, Raanan Katz attorney stated just yesterday "The will be a day when jury will look and see how false and mean-spirited her statements are..." This sounds like a bluff, Raanan Katz has nothing to produce and to show to jury in support of his one of many frivolous claims.
Take your pink glasses off, do not live under some type of freedom illusion.