I have been analyzing a lot of Raanan Katz cases where he was claiming damages without having them, and as the result not having any proof.
Well, it's easy to make a complaint against innocent person alleging him or her in anything and everything, and then go and harass with DAMAGES that do not exist.
Recent appeal decision concludes that Raanan Katz and Daniel Katz verified amended complaint alleging damages contradicts Daniel Katz's own testimony " there were substantially no vacancies in any of their rented space."
Here is another judge that concludes that Raanan Katz, Daniel Katz, RK Centers claim damages when none exist.
Judge SHEPHERD, C.J.concurring "I concur in the majority opinion. I write only to emphasize that the alleged claims for damages in this case for defamation, tortious interference, and invasion of privacy a rise solely out of alleged nefarious blog postings by the appellant.
Proof of harm in a case where, as here, the claimant is alleging potential customers or tenants did not contact them is difficult. See Murtagh v. Hurley , 40 So. 3d 62, 66 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010). Individual identification of customers who did not call or walk into a claimant’s place of business may not always be necessary. Id.at 65-66.
In this case, however, we need not concern ourselves with this type of conundrum. R.K. Associates stipulated at the injunction hearing that there were substantially no vacancies in any of their rented space. This is a sufficient basis on which to reverse the injunction in this case."
Raanan Katz , Daniel Katz, RK Centers represented by attorney Todd Levine, Todd Levine, Todd Levine -лыcый kapлик, yee prosto oxye!!!
Well, it's easy to make a complaint against innocent person alleging him or her in anything and everything, and then go and harass with DAMAGES that do not exist.
Recent appeal decision concludes that Raanan Katz and Daniel Katz verified amended complaint alleging damages contradicts Daniel Katz's own testimony " there were substantially no vacancies in any of their rented space."
Here is another judge that concludes that Raanan Katz, Daniel Katz, RK Centers claim damages when none exist.
Judge SHEPHERD, C.J.concurring "I concur in the majority opinion. I write only to emphasize that the alleged claims for damages in this case for defamation, tortious interference, and invasion of privacy a rise solely out of alleged nefarious blog postings by the appellant.
Proof of harm in a case where, as here, the claimant is alleging potential customers or tenants did not contact them is difficult. See Murtagh v. Hurley , 40 So. 3d 62, 66 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010). Individual identification of customers who did not call or walk into a claimant’s place of business may not always be necessary. Id.at 65-66.
In this case, however, we need not concern ourselves with this type of conundrum. R.K. Associates stipulated at the injunction hearing that there were substantially no vacancies in any of their rented space. This is a sufficient basis on which to reverse the injunction in this case."
Raanan Katz , Daniel Katz, RK Centers represented by attorney Todd Levine, Todd Levine, Todd Levine -лыcый kapлик, yee prosto oxye!!!