Yes, Raanan Katz, Daniel Katz, RK Centers (fourteen corporation plaintiffs), in Miami Dade Court case 11-17842 CA (32) had their motion for INDIRECT CRIMINAL CONTEMPT granted. On August 19, 2013 Judge Lisa Walsh of Eleventh Circuit Miami Court signed the Order to Show Cause that steams from Raanan Katz attorney of record Todd Levine's affidavit. Yesterday, during the hearing Judge Lisa Walsh verbally prohibited me from conducting deposition of Katzs attorney's Todd Levine.
So, I am facing criminal charges and have NO RIGHT to depose my accuser, who happened to be Raanan Katz attorney of record Todd Levine.
During the hearing on plaintiffs motion, Judge Lisa Walsh REFUSED to apply First Amendment to the matter. There is no doubt that an experienced Judge and attorney Lisa Walsh AWARES of the Florida and US Constitution, specifically First Amendment. There is no doubt that Plaintiffs attorney Todd Levine should have knowledge of these laws as well.
When applying for a CRIMINAL CONTEMPT that will curb somebody’s speech and freedom, the Affiant, Todd Levine, and the Court, Judge Lisa Walsh, MUST establish that the speech that is the subject of CRIMINAL CONTEMPT is not protected by the First Amendment.
Only a FALSE speech is not protected by the US and Florida Constitution and, therefore, can be prohibited by a court. Plaintiffs, affiant attorney Todd Levine failed to provide evidence showing that my blogs were false. In fact, it is crystal clear that alleged blogs are not false and in many cases are simple re-publication of the Public Court Records. I will go in details with every alleged in CRIMINAL contempt posting separately. Moreover, the plaintiffs failed to introduce any witnesses that could prove the truthfulness of articles or any documents that demonstrated their falsity. Clearly, when the plaintiffs and affiants were unable to show that the blogs were false, these publications were protected by the First Amendment, and the court could not proceed with the criminal charges. Additionally, plaintiffs and affiants failed to establish at the hearing an important element of tortious interference, that this blog statements actually caused Raanan Katz, RK Centers customers to breach their contracts with Raanan Katz, Daniel Katz, RK Centers. Judge Lisa Walsh simply ordered that the blogs "appear to be calculated to defame, tortiously interfere with, or otherwise cause harm to Plaintiffs." What that ...suppose to mean???
Raanan Katz was sentenced to jail terms for perjury, I will be sentenced for saying the TRUTH. This is how the law equally applies in Miami Land Of Free!!!
Here is the extraction from Judge Lisa Walsh Order To Show Cause.
a. publishing a blog on January 21, 2013, titled: "Raanan Katz, RK Centers Claim RK Plazas Have Limited Public Access." The blog indicates that Raanan Katz and Daniel Katz are preventing customers from entering their tenants' businesses in violation of the law. The blog also includes the label "commercial landlord racketeering" and represents that Plaintiffs engage in criminal activity. Moreover, the language, keywords, tags or labels in this blog appear to directly or indirectly interfere with Plaintiffs' advantageous or contractual business relationships, and appear to be calculated to defame, tortiously interfere with, or otherwise cause harm to Plaintiffs.
b. publishing a blog on January 25, 2013, titled "Raanan Katz, RK Centers: Liar, Liar, Pants On Fire." The blog refers to Plaintiffs as liars. Moreover, the language, keywords, tags or labels in this blog appear to directly or indirectly interfere with Plaintiffs' advantageous or contractual business relationships, and appear to be calculated to defame, tortiously interfere with, or otherwise cause harm to Plaintiffs.
c. publishing a blog on Mareh 11, 2013, titled: "RK Centers, Raanan Katz In House Attorney Moved Out." The blog employs the use of labels, which divert internet traffic to it. Labels ineluding "attorney position available" and "rk centers inhouse attorney" would intercept internet searches which use those terms. The blog also contains an illustration that appears to subject Plaintiffs to hatred, distrust, ridicule, conternpt, and/or disgrace and appears to suggest that Plaintiffs are engaged in a common area maintenance scam ("CAM Scarn"). Moreover, the language, keywords, tags or labels in this blog appear to directly or indirectly interfere with Plaintiffs' advantageous or contractual business relationships, and appear to be calculated to defame, tortiously interfere with, or otherwise cause harm to Plaintiffs.
d. publishing a blog on March 26, 2013, titled: "RK Centers, Raanan, Katz, 17070 COLLINS AVE SHOPPING CTR LTD Filed Voluntary Dismissal In Miarni Court." The blog represents that Plaintiffs engaged in irnproper or unlawful activity in seeking default in a lawsuit against a former tenant and later voluntarily dismissing that lawsuit. The blog contains a depiction of Plaintiff Raanan Katz in a manner that appears to subject hirn to hatred, distrust, ridicule, conternpt, and/or disgrace. Moreover, the language, keywords, tags or labels in this blog appear to directly or indirectly interfere with Plaintiffs' advantageous or contractual business relationships, and appear to be calculated to defarne, tortiously interfere with, or otherwise cause harrn to Plaintiffs.
e. publishing a blog on March 31, 2013, titled: "RK Centers, Raanan Katz: Another Default Victory In Miarni Court." The blog appears to indicate that Plaintiffs are fabricating their darnages. Moreover, the language, keywords, tags or labels in this blog appear to directly or indirectly interfere with Plaintiffs' advantageous or contractual business relationships, and appear to be calculated to defarne, tortiously interfere with, or otherwise cause harn to Plaintiffs.
f. publishing a blog on April 8, 2013, titled "RK Centers, Raanan Katz New Lawsuit in Miarni Court." The blog contains a depiction of Plaintiff Raanan Katz in a rnanner that appears to subject hirn to hatred, distrust, ridicule, conternpt, and/or disgrace. Moreover, the language, keywords, tags or labels in this blog appear to directly or indirectly interfere with Plaintiffs' advantageous or contractual business relationships, and appear to be calculated to defame, tortiously interfere with, or otherwise cause harrn to Plaintiffs.
g. publishing a blog on April 10, 2013, titled: "How Raanan Katz, RK Centers Fabricate Their Pleadings." The blog accuses Plaintiffs of lying and fabricating their pleadings. Moreover, the language, keywords, tags or labels in this blog appear to directly or indirectly interfere with Plaintiffs' advantageous or contractual business relationships, and appear to be calculated to defarne, tortiously interfere with, or otherwise cause harn to Plaintiffs.
h. publishing a blog on April 20, 2013, titled: "Raanan Katz: The Pieture is Unfair, They Make Fun of Me." The blog represents that Raanan Katz "likes suing people." The blog also appears to contain a threat to harm Raanan Katz. Moreover, the language, keywords, tags or labels in this blog appear to directly or indirectly interfere with Plaintiffs' advantageous or contractual business relationships, and appear to be calculated to defame, tortiously interfere with, or otherwise cause harn to Plaintiffs.
i. publishing a blog on April 29, 2013, titled: "Raanan Katz, RK Centers Adding Punitive Damages to the Claim." The blog appears to subject Raanan Katz to hatred, distrust, ridicule, contempt, and/or disgrace. Moreover, the language, keywords, tags or labels in this blog appear to directly or indirectly interfere with Plaintiffs' advantageous or contractual business relationships, and appear to be calculated to defame, tortiously interfere with, or otherwise cause harn to Plaintiffs."
So, I am facing criminal charges and have NO RIGHT to depose my accuser, who happened to be Raanan Katz attorney of record Todd Levine.
During the hearing on plaintiffs motion, Judge Lisa Walsh REFUSED to apply First Amendment to the matter. There is no doubt that an experienced Judge and attorney Lisa Walsh AWARES of the Florida and US Constitution, specifically First Amendment. There is no doubt that Plaintiffs attorney Todd Levine should have knowledge of these laws as well.
When applying for a CRIMINAL CONTEMPT that will curb somebody’s speech and freedom, the Affiant, Todd Levine, and the Court, Judge Lisa Walsh, MUST establish that the speech that is the subject of CRIMINAL CONTEMPT is not protected by the First Amendment.
Only a FALSE speech is not protected by the US and Florida Constitution and, therefore, can be prohibited by a court. Plaintiffs, affiant attorney Todd Levine failed to provide evidence showing that my blogs were false. In fact, it is crystal clear that alleged blogs are not false and in many cases are simple re-publication of the Public Court Records. I will go in details with every alleged in CRIMINAL contempt posting separately. Moreover, the plaintiffs failed to introduce any witnesses that could prove the truthfulness of articles or any documents that demonstrated their falsity. Clearly, when the plaintiffs and affiants were unable to show that the blogs were false, these publications were protected by the First Amendment, and the court could not proceed with the criminal charges. Additionally, plaintiffs and affiants failed to establish at the hearing an important element of tortious interference, that this blog statements actually caused Raanan Katz, RK Centers customers to breach their contracts with Raanan Katz, Daniel Katz, RK Centers. Judge Lisa Walsh simply ordered that the blogs "appear to be calculated to defame, tortiously interfere with, or otherwise cause harm to Plaintiffs." What that ...suppose to mean???
Raanan Katz was sentenced to jail terms for perjury, I will be sentenced for saying the TRUTH. This is how the law equally applies in Miami Land Of Free!!!
So, why Judge Lisa Walsh of Eleventh Circuit Miami Court refused to apply First Amendment prior to issuing the order to show case. Why Judge Lisa Walsh refused to EVEN consider that people, regular, working people in this country have a constitutional rights, in spite of the fact that they criticize rich and famous Miami Heat Owner Raanan Katz.Intimidation, harassment, and violation of first amendment should not be allowed by the Court Authorities like Judge Walsh.
Here is the extraction from Judge Lisa Walsh Order To Show Cause.
"This matter came before the Court on July 16, 2013 on Plaintiffs' Second Amended Motion for Contempt (as Supplemented by Stipulation of Counsel on July 9, 2013) (the "Motion"). The Court, having reviewed the file, heard argument of counsel, considered the sworn affidavits and other evidence in support of the Motion, reviewed materials filed in support of the Motion, and being otherwise duly advised in the premises, this Court finds as follows:...
5. Plaintiffs have petitioned this Court for an Order to Show Cause why THE BLOGGER should not be held in indirect criminal contempt of Court as a result of engaging in, inter alia, the following conduct in violation of paragraphs 2 and 3 of the Injunction:
a. publishing a blog on January 21, 2013, titled: "Raanan Katz, RK Centers Claim RK Plazas Have Limited Public Access." The blog indicates that Raanan Katz and Daniel Katz are preventing customers from entering their tenants' businesses in violation of the law. The blog also includes the label "commercial landlord racketeering" and represents that Plaintiffs engage in criminal activity. Moreover, the language, keywords, tags or labels in this blog appear to directly or indirectly interfere with Plaintiffs' advantageous or contractual business relationships, and appear to be calculated to defame, tortiously interfere with, or otherwise cause harm to Plaintiffs.
b. publishing a blog on January 25, 2013, titled "Raanan Katz, RK Centers: Liar, Liar, Pants On Fire." The blog refers to Plaintiffs as liars. Moreover, the language, keywords, tags or labels in this blog appear to directly or indirectly interfere with Plaintiffs' advantageous or contractual business relationships, and appear to be calculated to defame, tortiously interfere with, or otherwise cause harm to Plaintiffs.
c. publishing a blog on Mareh 11, 2013, titled: "RK Centers, Raanan Katz In House Attorney Moved Out." The blog employs the use of labels, which divert internet traffic to it. Labels ineluding "attorney position available" and "rk centers inhouse attorney" would intercept internet searches which use those terms. The blog also contains an illustration that appears to subject Plaintiffs to hatred, distrust, ridicule, conternpt, and/or disgrace and appears to suggest that Plaintiffs are engaged in a common area maintenance scam ("CAM Scarn"). Moreover, the language, keywords, tags or labels in this blog appear to directly or indirectly interfere with Plaintiffs' advantageous or contractual business relationships, and appear to be calculated to defame, tortiously interfere with, or otherwise cause harm to Plaintiffs.
d. publishing a blog on March 26, 2013, titled: "RK Centers, Raanan, Katz, 17070 COLLINS AVE SHOPPING CTR LTD Filed Voluntary Dismissal In Miarni Court." The blog represents that Plaintiffs engaged in irnproper or unlawful activity in seeking default in a lawsuit against a former tenant and later voluntarily dismissing that lawsuit. The blog contains a depiction of Plaintiff Raanan Katz in a manner that appears to subject hirn to hatred, distrust, ridicule, conternpt, and/or disgrace. Moreover, the language, keywords, tags or labels in this blog appear to directly or indirectly interfere with Plaintiffs' advantageous or contractual business relationships, and appear to be calculated to defarne, tortiously interfere with, or otherwise cause harrn to Plaintiffs.
e. publishing a blog on March 31, 2013, titled: "RK Centers, Raanan Katz: Another Default Victory In Miarni Court." The blog appears to indicate that Plaintiffs are fabricating their darnages. Moreover, the language, keywords, tags or labels in this blog appear to directly or indirectly interfere with Plaintiffs' advantageous or contractual business relationships, and appear to be calculated to defarne, tortiously interfere with, or otherwise cause harn to Plaintiffs.
f. publishing a blog on April 8, 2013, titled "RK Centers, Raanan Katz New Lawsuit in Miarni Court." The blog contains a depiction of Plaintiff Raanan Katz in a rnanner that appears to subject hirn to hatred, distrust, ridicule, conternpt, and/or disgrace. Moreover, the language, keywords, tags or labels in this blog appear to directly or indirectly interfere with Plaintiffs' advantageous or contractual business relationships, and appear to be calculated to defame, tortiously interfere with, or otherwise cause harrn to Plaintiffs.
g. publishing a blog on April 10, 2013, titled: "How Raanan Katz, RK Centers Fabricate Their Pleadings." The blog accuses Plaintiffs of lying and fabricating their pleadings. Moreover, the language, keywords, tags or labels in this blog appear to directly or indirectly interfere with Plaintiffs' advantageous or contractual business relationships, and appear to be calculated to defarne, tortiously interfere with, or otherwise cause harn to Plaintiffs.
h. publishing a blog on April 20, 2013, titled: "Raanan Katz: The Pieture is Unfair, They Make Fun of Me." The blog represents that Raanan Katz "likes suing people." The blog also appears to contain a threat to harm Raanan Katz. Moreover, the language, keywords, tags or labels in this blog appear to directly or indirectly interfere with Plaintiffs' advantageous or contractual business relationships, and appear to be calculated to defame, tortiously interfere with, or otherwise cause harn to Plaintiffs.
i. publishing a blog on April 29, 2013, titled: "Raanan Katz, RK Centers Adding Punitive Damages to the Claim." The blog appears to subject Raanan Katz to hatred, distrust, ridicule, contempt, and/or disgrace. Moreover, the language, keywords, tags or labels in this blog appear to directly or indirectly interfere with Plaintiffs' advantageous or contractual business relationships, and appear to be calculated to defame, tortiously interfere with, or otherwise cause harn to Plaintiffs."